Harry and Meghan had perfect platform for their ambitions, but royal life didn’t pay enough

Why have the couple spent the past 12 months desperately trying to disguise the fact that they have swapped duty for dollars?

Article content


LONDON — Confirmation that Harry and Meghan will not be returning as working members of the Royal family will have come as a shock to no one who has followed events since they dropped their “Megxit” bombshell on Jan 8 last year.

The couple announced they wanted to “carve out a progressive new role within this institution” to become “financially independent” while continuing to support the Queen.

They were to balance their time between the U.K. and “North America” in an effort to honour their commitment to “the Queen, the Commonwealth and our patronages.”

Yet within seconds of the post appearing on Instagram, anyone with even the most elementary understanding of the way the monarchy has functioned for the past 1,000 years knew the couple were never going to be able to have their cake and eat it.

This was pointed out clearly to the Sussexes at the Sandringham summit, where the Queen – supported by the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge – told Harry in no uncertain terms (Meghan had already left the U.K. by that point), that they were either in, or out, they couldn’t be in between.


This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Leaving the door ajar for a return to royal duties should their grand plan fail, the Queen agreed to a 12-month review period as a safety net. But it was never going to be possible for them to have the best of both worlds.

As yesterday’s Buckingham Palace statement put it: “In stepping away from the work of the Royal family it is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that come with a life of public service.”

Part of the problem is that the Sussexes do not seem to understand what public service is. As a California-born actress, Meghan can arguably be forgiven for this, but it somewhat beggars belief that Harry, a prince who grew up in the Firm, agreed to respond to the Queen’s statement yesterday with the line: “We can all live a life of service. Service is universal.”

Not only is it deeply disrespectful to engage in this sort of last word freakery with the Queen, but I also do not think the 94-year-old monarch, who has devoted her whole life to duty, needs to be lectured on service by anyone, not least when her 99-year-old husband remains in hospital.

Of course all royal engagements are self-promotional to a certain extent but there is a big difference between acts that serve others and self-serving acts.

In recent months, as the world has tried to get to grips with the pandemic, there has been a growing sense that while the royals have attempted to point the spotlight on the work of others, the Sussexes have increasingly tried to shine it on themselves.


This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

The royals have tried to hold a national conversation – exemplified by the Queen’s “We’ll Meet Again” speech – while in their £11 million Santa Barbara mansion, the Sussexes appear to have largely been in conversation with themselves.

They have insisted upon having both unprecedented privacy and maximum publicity. And while they have endlessly carped about the media, the Windsors have continued to keep calm, and carry on.

So, while it is undoubtedly highly commendable that the couple want to continue with their charity work, philanthropy is not, and never has been, the same as public service.

It should also be remembered that Archewell, their fundraising arm, is a non-profit organization, not a charity like the Cambridges’ Royal Foundation or the Prince of Wales’s Prince’s Trust. It’s an important distinction since charities are subject to far more stringent rules on how money is spent.

The other elephant that has remained in the room since the couple left for the U.S. is the central role that money has played in their decisions.

They are perfectly entitled to seek financial independence, and it has already proved a highly successful strategy with megabucks deals in the bag with the likes of Netflix, Spotify and now, presumably, Oprah.

Britain’s Prince Harry and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex visit Canada House in London, Britain January 7, 2020. Photo by Daniel Leal-Olivas/Pool /Reuters

But why have the couple spent the past 12 months desperately trying to disguise the fact that they have swapped duty for dollars?

Last year, they made a big point about keeping up Commonwealth ties by spending some time in Canada. Yet anyone with any knowledge of how the Duchess continued to keep on her retinue of U.S. advisers, even after she married Harry, knew when the couple said “North America”, what they actually meant was Los Angeles, the city of dreams. Vancouver Island was only ever a convenient staging post.


This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Yes, there might have been too much press intrusion, and the scrutiny must have sometimes been too much to bear, but they had the perfect platform for their aims and ambitions. The truth is, it didn’t pay well enough.

If there is any silver lining to the dark cloud hanging over the monarchy since Megxit, it is that the royals can now focus solely on their familial relationship with Harry and Meghan rather than their business dealings.

There is genuine sadness on both sides and among the public that it came to this. We fondly remember talk of the “Fab Four” with the Cambridges and Sussexes heralding a new era for the House of Windsor. But it was not to be.

They may no longer be working royals, but as HM put it with uncharacteristically emotional candour: “The Duke and Duchess remain much loved members of the family.”

As Harry and Meghan prepare to welcome a new baby into the fold, let us all hope that family proves to be the tie that binds.


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

File source

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button